Risky Business #157 -- Voluntary codes versus regulation
Fri, 07/02/2010 - 16:58
Topic Source:
WARNING: This week we missed some bad language during the edit... so hide this filthy podcast from your children's innocent ears.
On this week's show we're chatting with the head of Australia's Internet Industry Association (IIA), Peter Coroneos, about the government's plan to force internet users here to use antivirus software or be kicked off the tubes!
Peter was the architect of Australia's just released voluntary code for ISPs, but he'll be along soon to talk about why he thinks regulation here is actually a BAD idea. That's coming up soon.
User login
Recent podcasts
-
Symantec and McAfee kick off the year of the Dragon with some decent lulzā¦
-
Russians owned our pumps. Persians pwned our drones.
-
How to turn your Kindle into a free, global SSH and IRC modem...
-
Does the hype match the reality?
-
Rootkitting OS X, fun with EFI bootloaders and more...
Recent comments
- Thank you
8 hours 23 min ago - Enjoyed!
2 days 22 hours ago - Dan Kaminsky better get on
5 days 14 hours ago - Welcome back
6 days 15 hours ago - Cool
2 weeks 2 days ago - Work on the next episode
2 weeks 3 days ago - Why U No Podcast?
2 weeks 3 days ago - Ironically enough....
4 weeks 1 day ago - ANZ Falcon ad
4 weeks 1 day ago - What about Stratfor?
5 weeks 6 days ago




Regarding the news segment when Adam discussed bypassing DEP, I was wondering if these bypasses were effective when DEP is enabled both in the hardware and software.
That is, I thought enabling DEP on systems that have a processor that supports it (No execute or Execute Disable) was the real deal. And software only implementations of DEP weren't nearly as effective.
I brought this up because there was no mention of hardware/ software DEP in the discussion.
Are hardware and software enabled DEP machines much more secure than software only implementations?
Bird Lives!