Risky Business #159 -- Skimmers pay massive bribes downunder

6 replies [Last post]
Patrick Gray
Patrick Gray's picture
Offline
Veteran Member
BloggerNetcasterSite Owner
Joined: 03/02/2009

On this week's show we take a fresh look at the insider threat in light of the news, here in Australia, that criminal syndicates are paying up to $40,000 to bribe service station attendants into helping them skim cards.

If the bad guys are willing to pay $40k for someone that low on the food chain, what will they pay to get at someone in your organisation?

To find out we'll be joined by Gartner research director, AusCERT co-founder and former Commonwealth Bank security big-wig Rob McMillan.

Also this week we chat with Kaspersky's Vitaly Kamlyuk in the sponsor interview.

metlstorm
metlstorm's picture
Offline
Newbie
Joined: 03/18/2009
.lnk bug

Some more details have percolated out about the Windows .lnk bug we discussed in the news. Looks like its a .lnk that points to a .dll, and the dll's init code gets executed during load to get it's icon resource. Its a feature!

Microsoft has an advisory:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/2286198.mspx

and proof of concept code turned up on exploit db:
http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/14403/

fifth_sentinel
fifth_sentinel's picture
Offline
Newbie
Joined: 03/18/2009
Why this could be nasty for Enterprises

So, we can assume this is going to get used quite extensively to target the desktop market, but if you want to explain why this could be bad for the Enterprise consider this common scenario.

System admin is logged into a server and has to go fix something in someones network home directory (quotas, restoring a file etc etc). Now if a malicous Shortcut and malware has been copied to the users home directory without triggering AV, then the sys admin may have just infected their server. Now sys admins would never be logged in with Domain admin privs while doing this would they?

Unless I am not reading the current known info regarding the bug correctly, this is a realistic situation. Maybe we can ween sys admins off their mice by requiring them to use the CLI as a mitigation :)

Stedlar
Stedlar's picture
Offline
Newbie
Joined: 04/13/2009
.lnk bug

This is sounding really bad. I'm hearing that this can now be delivered via Web Site, Office Document and Email. Pat, are you covering this in any depth any time soon?

Patrick Gray
Patrick Gray's picture
Offline
Veteran Member
BloggerNetcasterSite Owner
Joined: 03/02/2009
Yeah, but I don't have any

Yeah, but I don't have any information on this being exploitable that way... I don't think that's right. Got a link?

Stedlar
Stedlar's picture
Offline
Newbie
Joined: 04/13/2009
.lnk bug

Ok, so web page exploit requires webdav?

http://www.us-cert.gov/current/#microsoft_windows_lnk_vulnerability

This vulnerability can also be exploited remotely through a malicious website, or through a malicious file or WebDAV share.

Patrick Gray
Patrick Gray's picture
Offline
Veteran Member
BloggerNetcasterSite Owner
Joined: 03/02/2009
Yeah I did spot that in the

Yeah I did spot that in the end... but I figure if you're running WebDAV you can probably be owned about 600 other ways as well. :)

It's mostly of concern because it can spread via shares or USB keys. Maybe someone will turn it into Conficker 2?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.